I'd like to be informed should information appear that joe is physically in germany (so he can have a little word with our little green (now blue ;) friends, they'll know how to handle his criminal activities :P -- Greetings, Sven Olaf Kamphuis, CB3ROB Ltd. & Co. KG ========================================================================= Address: Koloniestrasse 34 VAT Tax ID: DE267268209 D-13359 Registration: HRA 42834 B BERLIN Phone: +31/(0)87-8747479 Germany GSM: +49/(0)152-26410799 RIPE: CBSK1-RIPE e-Mail: sven at cb3rob.net ========================================================================= <penpen> C3P0, der elektrische Westerwelle ========================================================================= On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, Sven Olaf Kamphuis wrote: > Joe is also very happily spreading lies and crap on: > > http://torrentfreak.com/movie-studios-threaten-strike-on-pirate-bay-nuclear-bunker-100422/ > > -- > Greetings, > > Sven Olaf Kamphuis, > CB3ROB Ltd. & Co. KG > ========================================================================= > Address: Koloniestrasse 34 VAT Tax ID: DE267268209 > D-13359 Registration: HRA 42834 B > BERLIN Phone: +31/(0)87-8747479 > Germany GSM: +49/(0)152-26410799 > RIPE: CBSK1-RIPE e-Mail: sven at cb3rob.net > ========================================================================= > <penpen> C3P0, der elektrische Westerwelle > > ========================================================================= > > On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, John Palmer wrote: > >> Hugh - I hope you undertsand by now that none of Joe's claims about >> criminality and fraud in >> Europe have been proven true, in fact, evidence is that he was the only one >> who committed any >> kind of offense (stealing a bike). >> >> All of Joe's "evidence" is just his own writings on his silly little >> website that he crafts in a way to >> make them look like news articles that he has pinched from somewhere else. >> The casual (read: lazy) >> observer visiting his website will be fooled into thinking that they are >> authoritative. They are not. >> >> I have investigated his latest scam - the Gymnasium Querfurt incident and >> the results show that he >> pounced on more innocent victims in his mad vendetta against Herman Xennt >> and his group. The >> results of my investigation are here: >> >> http://lair.lionpost.net/pipermail/baptista-offenses/2010-April/000021.html >> >> He dragged an innocent high school student into his swirling pit of >> psychosis and annoyed the principal of >> a top school in Germany by pretending to be someone of knowledge and >> authority, which he is most >> certainly IS NOT. >> >> If you want an accurate depiction of what Joe did in Holland in 2005 - the >> damage he caused - see >> here for the real story: >> >> http://inaic.com/index.php?p=internet-terror >> Now Joe, if you want me to stop following you around to correct your lies, >> misrepresentations, half truths and paranoidravings, you need to be >> quiet:You will NEVER AGAIN call Herman or the people in Europe crooks, >> refer to their businesses and crooked, tell the lie that theyare criminals, >> tax cheats or other vile things WHICH THEY ARE NOT.You will NEVER, EVER >> again call anyone a "welfare bum" or insult members of their family or >> discuss those members ona public list without the person's permission.You >> will NEVER again claim that you in any way have any authority in the TLDA >> or that you are even a member or haveany right to tell the organization how >> to conduct its business. You will NEVER EVER engage in any other slander or >> other bad behavior in the inclusive namespace. You will NEVER EVER >> EVERagain seek to destroy or disrupt any registry, registrar, TLD reseller, >> root operator or other DNS professional in the Inclusive Namespace.You will >> avoid causing any other trouble to this industry or any other industry or >> cause that is important to me and the otherswith which I associate.If you >> continue to violate these rules, I will follow you around and pummel you >> into dust each and every time you open your filthy, slanderous and >> psychotic mouth so that the poor listeners can be given the truth about you >> and your destructive lies. This is a page Iam taking out of Tom Evan's >> book. GOT THAT, JOE.Cheers,John----- Original Message ----- From: Hugh >> Dierker >> To: cet1 at cam.ac.uk ; ga at gnso.icann.org >> GA ; Joe Baptista >> Cc: Paul Wouters ; Bind Users Mailing List ; Timothe Litt >> Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 11:15 PM >> Subject: Re: [ga] Re: Resolving .gov w/dnssec >> >> >> Fair trade is necessary trade. Unnecessary tradeoffs are lame. These >> problems are not necessary -- except that they are within the given >> framework of lack of motivation to do better. It comes down to this, if we >> set our standards outside of competitive models there is no incentive to do >> better. ICANN, the Dnssec and this SAIC are working within government >> sanctioned slobbery, both intellectual and economic slobbery. I used to >> think it was snobbery, now I know it is a laziness born of shovel leaning >> bureaucrats. You may be kind and call it "make work" but would you call >> intentional fraud "make work"? Buggy whips and Railroad fireman is what >> this is. >> >> The plan I am putting together for the inculsives will generate some >> new fire under the pants of these obstructionists and they will find that a >> better mousetrap can be built. >> >> >> >> --- On Thu, 4/22/10, Joe Baptista <baptista at publicroot.org> wrote: >> >> >> From: Joe Baptista <baptista at publicroot.org> >> Subject: [ga] Re: Resolving .gov w/dnssec >> To: cet1 at cam.ac.uk, "ga at gnso.icann.org >> GA" <ga at gnso.icann.org> >> Cc: "Paul Wouters" <paul at xelerance.com>, "Bind Users Mailing List" >> <bind-users at lists.isc.org>, "Timothe Litt" <litt at acm.org> >> Date: Thursday, April 22, 2010, 8:07 AM >> >> >> Looks like the future of the DNSSEC make work project includes >> resolution failures here and there. More security - less stability - >> guaranteed slavery. I wounder if it's a fair trade. >> >> we'll see .. >> regards >> joe baptista >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 10:52 AM, Chris Thompson <cet1 at cam.ac.uk> >> wrote: >> >> On Apr 22 2010, Paul Wouters wrote: >> >> >> On Thu, 22 Apr 2010, Timothe Litt wrote: >> >> >> I'm having trouble resolving uspto.gov with bind 9.6.1-P3 >> and 9.6-ESV >> configured as valdidating resolvers. >> >> Using dig, I get a connection timeout error after a long >> (~10 sec) delay. >> +cdflag provides an immediate response. >> >> >> >> Is anyone else seeing this? Ideas on how to troubleshoot? >> >> >> I have the same problems with our validating unbound instance. >> >> >> >> I suspect that this has to do with >> >> dig +dnssec +norec dnskey uspto.gov @dns1.uspto.gov. >> dig +dnssec +norec dnskey uspto.gov @sns2.uspto.gov. >> >> failing with timeouts, while dig +dnssec +norec +vc dnskey >> uspto.gov @dns1.uspto.gov. >> dig +dnssec +norec +vc dnskey uspto.gov @dns2.uspto.gov. >> >> work fine ... with a 1736-byte answer. Probably the fragmented >> UDP response is getting lost somewhere near the authoritative >> servers themselves. >> >> -- >> Chris Thompson >> Email: cet1 at cam.ac.uk >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> bind-users mailing list >> bind-users at lists.isc.org >> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users >> >> >> >> >> >