Hugh - I hope you undertsand by now that none of Joe's claims about criminality and fraud in Europe have been proven true, in fact, evidence is that he was the only one who committed any kind of offense (stealing a bike). All of Joe's "evidence" is just his own writings on his silly little website that he crafts in a way to make them look like news articles that he has pinched from somewhere else. The casual (read: lazy) observer visiting his website will be fooled into thinking that they are authoritative. They are not. I have investigated his latest scam - the Gymnasium Querfurt incident and the results show that he pounced on more innocent victims in his mad vendetta against Herman Xennt and his group. The results of my investigation are here: http://lair.lionpost.net/pipermail/baptista-offenses/2010-April/000021.html He dragged an innocent high school student into his swirling pit of psychosis and annoyed the principal of a top school in Germany by pretending to be someone of knowledge and authority, which he is most certainly IS NOT. If you want an accurate depiction of what Joe did in Holland in 2005 - the damage he caused - see here for the real story: http://inaic.com/index.php?p=internet-terror Now Joe, if you want me to stop following you around to correct your lies, misrepresentations, half truths and paranoidravings, you need to be quiet:You will NEVER AGAIN call Herman or the people in Europe crooks, refer to their businesses and crooked, tell the lie that theyare criminals, tax cheats or other vile things WHICH THEY ARE NOT.You will NEVER, EVER again call anyone a "welfare bum" or insult members of their family or discuss those members ona public list without the person's permission.You will NEVER again claim that you in any way have any authority in the TLDA or that you are even a member or haveany right to tell the organization how to conduct its business. You will NEVER EVER engage in any other slander or other bad behavior in the inclusive namespace. You will NEVER EVER EVERagain seek to destroy or disrupt any registry, registrar, TLD reseller, root operator or other DNS professional in the Inclusive Namespace.You will avoid causing any other trouble to this industry or any other industry or cause that is important to me and the otherswith which I associate.If you continue to violate these rules, I will follow you around and pummel you into dust each and every time you open your filthy, slanderous and psychotic mouth so that the poor listeners can be given the truth about you and your destructive lies. This is a page Iam taking out of Tom Evan's book. GOT THAT, JOE.Cheers,John----- Original Message ----- From: Hugh Dierker To: cet1 at cam.ac.uk ; ga at gnso.icann.org >> GA ; Joe Baptista Cc: Paul Wouters ; Bind Users Mailing List ; Timothe Litt Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 11:15 PM Subject: Re: [ga] Re: Resolving .gov w/dnssec Fair trade is necessary trade. Unnecessary tradeoffs are lame. These problems are not necessary -- except that they are within the given framework of lack of motivation to do better. It comes down to this, if we set our standards outside of competitive models there is no incentive to do better. ICANN, the Dnssec and this SAIC are working within government sanctioned slobbery, both intellectual and economic slobbery. I used to think it was snobbery, now I know it is a laziness born of shovel leaning bureaucrats. You may be kind and call it "make work" but would you call intentional fraud "make work"? Buggy whips and Railroad fireman is what this is. The plan I am putting together for the inculsives will generate some new fire under the pants of these obstructionists and they will find that a better mousetrap can be built. --- On Thu, 4/22/10, Joe Baptista <baptista at publicroot.org> wrote: From: Joe Baptista <baptista at publicroot.org> Subject: [ga] Re: Resolving .gov w/dnssec To: cet1 at cam.ac.uk, "ga at gnso.icann.org >> GA" <ga at gnso.icann.org> Cc: "Paul Wouters" <paul at xelerance.com>, "Bind Users Mailing List" <bind-users at lists.isc.org>, "Timothe Litt" <litt at acm.org> Date: Thursday, April 22, 2010, 8:07 AM Looks like the future of the DNSSEC make work project includes resolution failures here and there. More security - less stability - guaranteed slavery. I wounder if it's a fair trade. we'll see .. regards joe baptista On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 10:52 AM, Chris Thompson <cet1 at cam.ac.uk> wrote: On Apr 22 2010, Paul Wouters wrote: On Thu, 22 Apr 2010, Timothe Litt wrote: I'm having trouble resolving uspto.gov with bind 9.6.1-P3 and 9.6-ESV configured as valdidating resolvers. Using dig, I get a connection timeout error after a long (~10 sec) delay. +cdflag provides an immediate response. Is anyone else seeing this? Ideas on how to troubleshoot? I have the same problems with our validating unbound instance. I suspect that this has to do with dig +dnssec +norec dnskey uspto.gov @dns1.uspto.gov. dig +dnssec +norec dnskey uspto.gov @sns2.uspto.gov. failing with timeouts, while dig +dnssec +norec +vc dnskey uspto.gov @dns1.uspto.gov. dig +dnssec +norec +vc dnskey uspto.gov @dns2.uspto.gov. work fine ... with a 1736-byte answer. Probably the fragmented UDP response is getting lost somewhere near the authoritative servers themselves. -- Chris Thompson Email: cet1 at cam.ac.uk _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users at lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://LAIR.LIONPOST.NET/pipermail/baptista-offenses/attachments/20100423/cedea215/attachment.html